LF

Automating the Automation – No Code ‘Environment Synthetics’

16

February, 2018

by Niall Crawford

The intention of environment synthetics is to provide ‘high-level of confidence’ applications (your system instances e.g. UAT Home Loan System) and their underlying component services (e.g. IIS, MSQL, Oracle, LDAP etc.) are operational and available for testing.

An ongoing activity that is laborious and surprisingly still completed manually in many organizations.

An approach that is suboptimal and quite costly.

As a way of example:  a medium to large company.

The Cost of Manually Testing your Environment Health

  • I need to test each test system (maybe production) every morning.
  • I have 100 systems (each with 5 instances), that is 500 test system instances.
  • The average manpower of testing each instance is 15m.
  • Daily cost = 15m/60 (hour) x 500 x $100 (hourly charge rate) = $12,500 per day.
  • Annual cost of manually testing health of our Test Environments

240 (business days) x $12,500 = $3M pa.

Note: This example excludes potential saving from cost avoidance due to delays & outages.

So, even without considering the saving in broader areas like delay and outage avoidance, we can see a compelling reason to automate. I think we can probably agree that some form of test automation is good.

As an example:

ROI of Building a Test Automation Synthetics Framework

  • 500 Scripts
  • Time to build each script originally is 16 hours (inc analysis, design, build & test).
  • Estimated maintenance & execution of script 16 hours pa.
  • Annual Cost of Automated Testing

500 x 32 hours x $100 (hourly charge rate) = 1.6M Year-1 ($800K Y2 onward).

  • ROI (compared to Manual) = 1.6M (Year1) and 2.4M (Year2+)

Pitfalls of Test Automation

However, there are pitfalls with this approach,

  • There is the cost of the tools (often expensive).
  • The likelihood of resources (SMEs) being more expensive.
  • The ongoing need to coordinate, build, maintain, and execute the artefacts (refer above).
  • The reality that mileage so often varies due to the quality and efficiency of the resources involved.

So, can we do it better?

Well potentially yes, but it would require you to somehow displace the automation described above or potentially automate the creation of the automation. This method would displace automation build costs, resourcing costs, and ensures standardisation.

Enter Enov8

Enov8 is pleased to announce its latest environment management ‘innovation’ with the introduction of:

  • No Code Lean Synthetics.
    A perfect and immediate complement to organizations existing test environment health techniques.

Enov8 ‘no code’ synthetics allows you to automatically, without scripting (or record & playback):

  1. Determine the health of your test systems using ‘silver thread’ transactions.
  2. Analyze the underlying component services.

A solution that will allow even ‘mature’ (automated) organizations to find a significant ROI.

ROI of Enov8 “No Code Lean Synthetics” Framework

  • Time to build each script originally is 30m (inc analysis, design, build & test).
  • Estimated maintenance and execution of script 30m pa.
  • Annual cost of Lean Synthetics:
    500 x 1-hour x $100 (hourly charge rate) = $50K Year-1 ($25K Y2 onward).
  • ROI (compared to Manual health checks) = 2.95M (Year1) and 2.975M (Year2+)
    A significant ROI would also be found if we were comparing it to a test automation framework.
  • ROI (compared to test automation health checks) = 1.55M (Year1) and 775K (Year2+)
    Enov8 Lean Synthetics is now available to Enov8 Environment Manager customers.

Innovate with Enov8

If you are interested in learning more about IT & Test Environment Management and IT Release Management, contact us about EcoSystem.

Enov8 EcoSystem is the worlds leading IT Enterprise Intelligence platform.

Ecosystem is a fully configurable and easily integratable solution that comes with out of the box “enterprise management” functions that support IT & Test Environment Management, Release Management, Data Management, IT Operations Management, Configuration Management & Service Management.

Niall Crawford

Niall is the Co-Founder and CIO of Enov8. He has 25 years of experience working across the IT industry from Software Engineering, Architecture, IT & Test Environment Management and Executive Leadership. Niall has worked with, and advised, many global organisations covering verticals like Banking, Defence, Telecom and Information Technology Services.

Relevant Articles

Why Is Test Data Management So Important?

18 NOVEMBER, 2019 by Carlos Schults Test data management is vital for achieving a healthy test automation strategy, yet many professionals are still not familiar with the term. They don’t know what the concept means, nor why it’s so important. But why would that be a...

Incorporating Test Data / Data Compliance in DevOps

03 NOVEMBER, 2019 by Arnab Roy Chowdhury DevOps, a word that combines “development” and “operations,” is a business process that shortens the time taken to gather customer feedback. Besides, it also enables progressive software delivery and helps clients grab market...

Are You TEM Savvy?

30 OCTOBER, 2019 by Erik Dietrich Measuring TEM Capability in Your Enterprise Once upon a time, testing your software was easy. Or, at least, relatively speaking, it was. Your team would write some code, tag an unreleased version of the software, build it, and hand it...

Software Security Anti-Patterns

22 OCTOBER, 2019 by Eric Boersma If you're like a lot of developers, you might not think much about software security. Sure, you hash your users' passwords before they're stored in your database. You don't return sensitive information in error messages. Each time you...

How Data Breaches Happen?

08 OCTOBER, 2019 by Michiel Mulders Preamble You’ve probably seen some recent articles asserting that the world’s most valuable resource is no longer oil—it’s data. New internet titans like Google, Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Microsoft look unstoppable. In fact,...

DevOps and TEM Go Hand in Glove

25 SEPTEMBER, 2019 by Mark Henke DevOps is overall a healthy practice for most development teams, but it doesn’t come for free. Enterprises are eager to adopt the practice but their tools often lag behind DevOps practices. This is a bit like walking out into the...